Unreasonable
91Search and seizure — is a legal procedure used in many civil law and common law legal systems whereby police or other authorities and their agents, who suspect that a crime has been committed, do a search of a person s property and confiscate any relevant evidence to …
92Wolf v. Colorado — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Wolf v. Colorado ArgueDate=October 19 ArgueYear=1948 DecideDate=June 27 DecideYear=1949 FullName=Julius A. Wolf v. State of Colorado USVol=338 USPage=25 Citation=69 S. Ct. 1359; 93 L. Ed. 1782; 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2079… …
93Katz v. United States — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Katz v. United States ArgueDate=October 17 ArgueYear=1967 DecideDate=December 18 DecideYear=1967 FullName=Charles Katz v. United States USVol=389 USPage=347 Citation=88 S. Ct. 507; 19 L. Ed. 2d 576; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2… …
94Mistake (criminal law) — This article is about the criminal defense. For other uses, see Mistake. Criminal defenses …
95Atwater v. City of Lago Vista — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants=Atwater v. City of Lago Vista ArgueDate=December 4 ArgueYear=2000 DecideDate=April 24 DecideYear=2001 FullName=Gail Atwater, et al., Petitionors v. City of Lago Vista, et al. USVol=532 USPage=318 Citation=121 S. Ct.… …
96R. v. Collins — SCCInfoBox case name=R. v. Collins full case name=Ruby Collins v. Her Majesty The Queen heard date=May 27, 1986 decided date=April 9, 1987 citations= [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265 docket=17937 history=Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for… …
97Cheek v. United States — Supreme Court of the United States Argued October 3, 1990 Decided January 8, 1 …
98R. v. Tessling — SCCInfoBox case name=R. v. Tessling heard date=April 16, 2004 decided date=October 29, 2004 full case name=Her Majesty The Queen v. Walter Tessling citations= [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432, 2004 SCC 67 prior history= subsequent history= ratio=police use of …
99South Dakota v. Opperman — SCOTUSCase Litigants=South Dakota v. Opperman ArgueDate=March 29 ArgueYear=1976 DecideDate=July 6 DecideYear=1976 FullName=South Dakota v. Opperman USVol=428 USPage=364 Citation=96 S. Ct. 3092; 49 L. Ed. 2d 1000; 1976 U.S. LEXIS 15… …
100Nordenfelt v. Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co — Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co. Ltd [1894] AC 535 is a 19th century English case decided by the House of Lords. It defines the blue pencil test as a method for deciding whether contractual obligations can be partially… …
