unreasonable
121Network neutrality — This article is about the general principle of network neutrality. For its specific application to Canada, see Network neutrality in Canada. For its application to the U.S., see Network neutrality in the United States. Network Neutrality Related… …
122Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. ArgueDate=January 27 ArgueYear=1926 ReargueDate=October 12 ReargueYear=1926 DecideDate=November 22 DecideYear=1926 FullName=Village of Euclid, Ohio, et al. v. Ambler Realty Company …
123Weeks v. United States — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Weeks v. United States ArgueDateA=December 2 ArgueDateB=3 ArgueYear=1913 DecideDate=February 24 DecideYear=1914 FullName=Fremont Weeks v. United States USVol=232 USPage=383 Citation=34 S. Ct. 341; 58 L. Ed. 652; 1914 U.S.… …
124Open fields doctrine — For other uses, see Open field (disambiguation). The open fields doctrine is a U.S. legal doctrine created judicially for purposes of evaluating claims of an unreasonable search by the government in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.… …
125Tarnak Farm incident — Maj. Harry Schmidt and wife Lisa enter the Tarnak Farms Article 32 hearing room. Date April 17, 200 …
126Act 250 (Vermont law) — In the spring of 1970, the Vermont legislature passed [http://www.nrb.state.vt.us/lup/statute.htm Act 250] , known as the Land Use and Development Act. Development pressures resulting from the opening of two interstate highways (I 89 and I 91)… …
127Dr. Bonham's Case — Dr. Bonham s Case …
128Section Eight of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — provides everyone in Canada with protection against unreasonable search and seizure. This Charter right provides Canadians with their primary source of constitutionally enforced privacy rights against unreasonable intrusion from the state.… …
